The proposed sale would damage the environment. No logger could sell the timber for more than it cost to cut the trees down and transport them. The new sale proposed by the U. Forest Service is still unprofitable, but the Forest Service sweetened the deal for private loggers by shifting much of the cost to U. The agency funded nearly all the road construction needed for the sale. The Forest Service also approved the sale for percent export — increasing immediate value for the logger but reducing the local economic benefit of the sale. The Forest Service failed to evaluate, in a supplemental environmental impact statement, whether the high environmental, social, and economic costs of the sale could be justified in light of the increased cost to taxpayers and the decreased economic benefit of the sale.
Environmental organizations filed a lawsuit against the U. EPA in the D. Circuit, challenging his failure to hold the hardrock mining industry financially responsible for cleaning up its toxic pollution. A proposed EPA rule would have required mining companies to demonstrate that they have the funds, up front, to cover cleanup of hazardous substances at mine sites.
The rulemaking served to implement EPA authority granted 30 years ago under the federal Superfund program, and was initiated after more than a decade of litigation brought by environmentalists alarmed by toxic releases from hardrock mining — the leading source of hazardous releases in the U. Yet Pruitt abandoned the new rule in December, effectively giving mining companies a huge handout and pinning the cost burden on taxpayers instead. Throughout the western U.
Edh Hidden Gems
When mine operators lack the funds to address these hazards, the cost burden is shifted onto taxpayers — often to the tune of hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars for a single site. And because there are only limited public funds available for cleanup, shifting the cleanup burden to taxpayers also means that cleanups are delayed, leaving public lands and nearby communities to live with poisoned land and water for decades.
In a legal battle stretching back more than a decade, plaintiffs pushed the EPA to complete this rulemaking process and require industry to demonstrate its financial ability not just to clean up expected hazards but also unanticipated toxic spills and accidents. Ultimately, this rule would have incentivized mining companies to avoid leaving cancer-causing chemicals behind, and kept the financial burden of cleanups off the backs of taxpayers.
Conservationists filed suit in U. District Court in Montana against the Bureau of Land Management and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to demand that the administration uphold the deal made to save the greater sage-grouse and its habitat in 10 Western states. Under this administration, leasing and proposed leasing in sage-grouse habitat has increased, threatening the conservation of the species.
The lawsuit says the federal government has violated two laws, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, by disregarding the greater sage-grouse conservation plans and offering oil and gas leases on important sage-grouse habitat on public lands in Montana, Nevada and Wyoming in conflict with the safeguards detailed in the plans. In December alone, nearly 90 percent of the more than parcels offered for oil and gas leases in Montana and 93 percent of the 45 parcels in Wyoming were in sage-grouse habitat.
In addition to the leases challenged in this sale, more oil and gas leasing is proposed in sage-grouse habitat in Colorado and across the West. Based on a preliminary list, virtually all of a , acre lease sale scheduled for December in Wyoming is in sage grouse habitat. The protection of sage-grouse habitat is the result of one of the largest conservation efforts in U. The planning effort, which took more than four years, involved intensive efforts by the U. Forest Service, Western governors, sportsmen, public lands users, and representatives of the oil and gas and ranching industries.
Since taking office in , however, the Trump administration has ignored those protections while offering hundreds of new leases in important sage-grouse habitat. Sage-grouse populations, which once numbered in the millions, have been decimated by oil and gas development and other disturbances. Earthjustice is challenging a U.
Environmental Protection Agency decision to reject Obama-era standards that limit carbon dioxide emissions from cars and light trucks for model years — But at the direction of President Trump, the EPA revisited that determination, and in April withdrew it, claiming the emission standards are not appropriate and should be revised.
The lawsuit was filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by several public interest organizations, including Earthjustice. It joins previous suits filed by California and over a dozen other states, and by business interests opposed to the rollback. The case will be argued on Jul. Fish and Wildlife Service are required under the Endangered Species Act to complete a consultation with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management on its oversight of oil and gas operations that could impact threatened and endangered species.
The last time the agencies completed a consultation, called a biological opinion, was in , three years before the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster which led to the worst offshore oil spill in U.
The Largest Travel Trade and Consumer Show in North America
The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Florida, challenges the agencies for unreasonably delaying completion of a new consultation and seeking a court order to compel them to complete it within three months. A new biological opinion likely would result in additional safeguards to prevent further harm to sea turtles, whales, and other threatened and endangered species from oil and gas operations in the Gulf.
- LIVERPOOL: 6x4 CHARLIE ADAM SIGNED LIVERPOOL: ACTION CHARLIE PHOTO+COA!
- Outside In.
- Download e-book COMMANDERS LOST TREASURES YOU CAN FIND IN THE STATE OF WYOMING - FULL COLOR EDITION.
- The Paperbats: Metro Saves the Day?
- Site Search Navigation!
- Unbroken: How God Made Me Whole Again.
Explorers find refuge in its pristine waters and forested lands, which offer 1, miles of canoe routes and 18 hiking trails. The area also includes more than 1, lakes left by receding glaciers and hundreds of miles of streams. On behalf of our clients, Earthjustice filed a lawsuit on Jun.
The organizations joined nine Minnesota businesses that filed a separate lawsuit to protect this cherished recreation area from mining. Our clients joined nine Minnesota businesses that filed a separate lawsuit to protect this cherished recreation area from mining. The pollution resulting from sulfide-ore copper mining would inevitably harm the water quality and ecology of these protected public lands and waterways.
The local economy — which is sustained by tourism and jobs connected to this fishing, canoeing, and camping mecca — would also suffer. Last month, the Interior Department reinstated the two expired mineral leases, which date back to The decision paves the way for Twin Metals to build an industrial mining complex on the edge of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Keeping this dangerous proposal alive is an end-run around that judicious conclusion, the Forest Service, and the public. Since , the Freedom of Information Act has provided the public the right to request records from any federal agency.
It is a law that keeps the American people in the know about their government. When a member of the public lodges a request with a federal agency under this Act, the agency must promptly disclose any information requested unless the information falls under one of the nine exemptions protecting interests such as personal privacy, national security, and law enforcement. Earthjustice filed suit in federal court in the Northern District of California to pry lose suspected new agency guidelines around transparency at the Department of Interior put in place under Secretary Ryan Zinke.
The lawsuit comes amid a deeply problematic culture of secrecy that has taken root in the Department of the Interior, hiding information from the American public about major decisions, important records, and meetings with industry that affect the lands and resources the agency holds in trust for the American people. The transparency lawsuit filed outlines several harmful Interior Department policies that have been reported , including a potential new practice of top officials reviewing the release of documents about themselves before they are released to the public under the Freedom of Information Act.
Organizations are finding that they must turn to the courts to receive responses to Freedom of Information Act requests, and even then, the agency drags its feet.disibyru.tk
Federal law gives the agency 20 days to respond to a request. The lawsuit looks to uncover more about these and related policies. Earthjustice sued the Trump administration for opening up more than 78 million acres of the Gulf of Mexico to offshore drilling without fully analyzing the risks to people, wildlife, and the environment.
The lease sales targeted in the suit are the largest ever offered for oil and gas development in U. While the March sale drew less interest, it still sold 50 percent more acres than the previous lease sale in August at a significantly lower cost per acre. The suit challenges both the sales. In a departure from past practices, BOEM is now offering essentially all available, unleased acreage in the Gulf that is not subject to a congressional moratorium i.
The effect is to reduce competition for available blocks and to allow fossil fuel companies to acquire and hoard leases at rock bottom prices. The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Washington, D. Additionally, the lawsuit charges that BOEM significantly underestimates the degree to which each lease sale would affect overall oil and gas development in the Gulf of Mexico and the effects on global climate change. Environmental Protection Agency for failing to release documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act related to a proposed EPA rule that would prohibit the agency's use of peer reviewed scientific studies that have long been relied on to protect the health and safety of millions of Americans.
The rule would bar the agency from considering key public health studies when making decisions about vital protections for human health and the environment. Acting EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler has not withdrawn this harmful Censored Science proposal, despite calls to do so from public health experts, leading scientists, environmental advocates, and many other concerned Americans.
The limited information currently available indicates that Pruitt was attempting to unilaterally implement a policy that had repeatedly failed to pass Congress, and was attempting to bypass standard interagency review. Consumer, health, and food safety groups are challenging a Food and Drug Administration rule that undermines the integrity of our food safety system.
- From Voyeur to Venus.
- Edh Hidden Gems?
- The New York Times Travel Show!
- Juno Beach: A Players Tale.
- Ladyboys Letting Go: Originally Released as Porns Stars Book II.
- Four Views of Christ-Characteristic Differences of the Four Gospels.
Chemical and food manufacturers often seek to add chemicals to processed food, typically to enhance flavor, add nutrients, or prevent spoilage.